Loomis v. Ss Santa Rosa

Good Law
447 F.2d 105
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 24, 197125368California1,797 words

Opinion

Opinion

447 F.2d 105 Edith LOOMIS, Appellant, v. SS SANTA ROSA, her engines, boilers, machinery, tackle, apparel and appurtenances, etc., and Hamburg-Sudamerikanische Dampfschiffahrts-Gesellschaft Eggert & Amsinck, Appellees. No. 25368. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 14, 1971. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc September 24, 1971. John D. Healy (argued), of Oppenheimer, Brown, Wolff, Leach & Foster, St. Paul, Minn., Martin P. Detels, Jr., of Detels, Draper & Marinkovich, Seattle, Wash., for appellant. Theodore A. LeGros (argued), of Howard, LeGros, Buchanan & Paul, Seattle, Wash., for appellees. Before HAMLEY, DUNIWAY and CHOY, Circuit Judges. HAMLEY, Circuit Judge: 1 Mrs. Edith Loomis, a citizen of Minnesota, brought this action for personal injury damages in federal district court, Western District of Washington, Northern Division. The action was in rem against the SS SANTA ROSA, her engines, boilers, machinery, tackle, apparel and appurtenances, and in personam against Hamburg-Sudamerikanische Dampfschiffahrts-Gesellschaft Eggert & Amsinck (Hamburg), the owner and operator of the defendant vessel, Bakke Steamship Corporation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.