Victor Tabarez Navarro v. United States

Good Law
449 F.2d 113·1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7895
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 197126654California595 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duniway, J.

Navarro appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis.

The District Court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 ; we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

In 1955, Navarro pled guilty to a charge of violation of 26 U.S.C. § 4744 (a), in that he was a transferee of marihuana who had not paid the tax required by 26 U.S.C. § 4741 (a). In Leary v. United States, 1969, 395 U.S. 6 , 89 S.Ct. 1532 , 23 L.Ed.2d 57 , and United States v. Covington, 1969, 395 U.S. 57 , 89 S.Ct. 1559 , 23 L.Ed.2d 94 , the Court held that invocation of the privilege against self-incrimination would provide a complete defense to the foregoing charge. In United States v. Ingman, 9 Cir., 1970, 426 F.2d 973 , we held that Leary is retroactive. We followed United States v. Meadows, 9 Cir., 1969, 420 F.2d 795 , where we also held that a guilty plea entered at a time when the defendant could not know of the defense, was not a waiver of it. (426 F.2d p. 797) (Meadows involved 26 U.S.C. §§ 5851 and 5841, but the principle is the same.) The government relies on United States v. Weber, 9 Cir., 1970, 429 F.2d 148 , in which doubt was expressed as to the authority of Ingman and Meadows.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.