Arizona State Department of Public Welfare v. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Maricopa County Legal Aid Clients v. Arizona State Department of Public Welfare and Department of Health, Education and Welfare

Good Law
449 F.2d 456
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 197171-1177_1California14,227 words

Opinion

Opinion

449 F.2d 456 ARIZONA STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE, Respondent. MARICOPA COUNTY LEGAL AID CLIENTS, Petitioners, v. ARIZONA STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE and Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Respondents. No. 71-1177. No. 71-1250. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. September 14, 1971. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied November 17, 1971. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED No. 71-1177: Gary K. Nelson, Ariz. Atty. Gen., James B. Feeley, Michael S. Flam, Peter Sownie, Asst. Attys. Gen., Phoenix, Ariz., for petitioner. Leonard Schaitman (argued), Morton Hollander, Dept. of Justice, L. Patrick Gary, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., Stephanie W. Naidoff, Asst. Regional Atty., James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Jerry Levine (argued), Tempe, Ariz., Mark B. Raven, (argued), Tucson, Ariz. Michael Serwatka (argued), DNA, Inc., Chinle, Ariz., John D Twiname, Administrator, Dept. of HEW, Washington, D. C., for intervenors. No. 71-1250: Jerry Levine, (argued), Tempe, Ariz., Mark B. Raven, Tucson, Ariz., Michael Serwatka, DNA, Inc.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.