In re Marriage of Kale CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 2015A143852California889 words

Opinion

Opinion

Margulies, J.

Filed 9/24/15 In re Marriage of Kale CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

In re the Marriage of MEENA and

AVINASH KALE.

MEENA KALE, A143852

Respondent, (Alameda County v. Super. Ct. No. HF06288729)

AVINASH KALE,

Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Avinash Kale (Husband), in propria persona, appeals from the trial court’s October 24, 2014 decision regarding financial issues in this marital dissolution action. The decision was entered after a four-day trial. In the decision, the trial court ordered Husband to reimburse Meena Kale (Wife) for various expenses related to their minor children, as well as Husband’s share…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.