International Franchise Ass'n v. City of Seattle

Good Law
803 F.3d 389·2015 WL 5637542·25 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 701·2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16963
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 201515-35209California8,510 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hawkins, J.

The International Franchise Association (“IFA”) appeals the denial of a preliminary injunction which IFA sought in order to prevent the City of Seattle (“City”) from enforcing ^ provision in its recently enacted minimum wage ordinance. The provision classifies certain franchisees as large employers, subjecting them as a result to a steeper schedule of incremental wage increases over the next five years. While we express no view as to the ultimate merits, we affirm because IFA did not, at this stage in the proceeding, show it is likely to succeed on the merits or that a preliminary injunction is in the public interest.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Shortly after taking office, Seattle May- or Ed Murray assembled an Income Inequality Advisory Committee (“IIAC”) tasked with making recommendations “on how best to increase the minimum wage in Seattle.” The IIAC consisted of twenty-four members and included representatives from the business community and labor unions. Following a series of meetings and public engagement forums, the ■IIAC recommended enacting staged increases in the minimum wage, with smaller businesses subject to a more gradual schedule, recognizing that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.