Brooks

Brooks v. Pinnacle Financial Corp. CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 2015B252060California6,480 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Filed 9/25/15 Brooks v. Pinnacle Financial Corp. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

PATRICK BROOKS, B252060

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC500541) v.

PINNACLE FINANCIAL

CORPORATION et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Rolf M. Treu, Judge. Affirmed. Patrick C. Brooks, in pro per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Severson & Werson, Kerry W. Franich and Jan T. Chilton for Defendant and Respondent Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. Kuzyk Law and Mark J. Leonardo for Defendant and Respondent DCB United,

LLC.

Starre & Cohn and Gary A. Starre for Defendants and Respondents Varougan…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.