FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 25 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 14-10492 14-10544 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:13-cr-456-MMD v. 2:13-cr-401-GMN

BENITO LOAIZA-PARRA, a.k.a. Jose Martinez-Gutierrez, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 21, 2015**

Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Benito Loaiza-Parra appeals the 30-month

sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien

found unlawfully in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the 24-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Loaiza-Parra argues that the sentences are substantively unreasonable in

light of his difficult history and circumstances, and other mitigating factors. The

district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Loaiza-Parra’s sentences. See

Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The within-Guidelines sentences are

substantively reasonable in light of the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing

factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Loaiza-Parra’s extensive

criminal and immigration history. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51; United States v.

Gutierrez-Sanchez, 587 F.3d 904, 908 (9th Cir. 2009) (“The weight to be given the

various factors in a particular case is for the discretion of the district court.”).

AFFIRMED.

2 14-10492 & 14-10544