Marriage of Wyman and Pawar CA1/5
Opinion
Opinion
Bruiniers, J.
I. BACKGROUND
Pawar provides only a limited record of proceedings in the trial court and cites to none of it.2 He simply recites in his briefs what he perceives to be the “facts.” The only record citations are provided by Wyman.3 We recite the facts based on that record. The parties’ marriage was dissolved on September 15, 2000. The limited record we have indicates that the custody and visitation order Pawar complains of was entered on April 15, 2014, following a hearing conducted on March 12, 2014, before the Honorable Tara Flanagan.4 The order granted sole legal and physical custody to Wyman. Pawar was granted “custodial visitation” in four-hour increments during the child’s spring breaks, three nonconsecutive weeks of summer visitation, and twice weekly telephone calls. The court also ordered that the child attend individual psychotherapeutic counseling with a counselor selected by Wyman, and required that the costs be “split equally between the parties.” A request by Pawar for a custody evaluation was “denied without prejudice.” Pawar’s “request for reimbursement for payment for Dr. Sugarman’s services” was also denied without prejudice. No transcript of the March 2014…