Hughes v. Tower Park Properties, LLC (In Re Tower Park Properties, LLC)

Good Law
803 F.3d 450·2015 WL 5668879·61 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 168·74 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 855·2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17072
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 28, 201513-56045California6,664 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bybee, J.

The Bankruptcy Code confers a “right to be heard” with respect to “any issue in a case under [Chapter 11]” on any “party in interest.” 11 U.S.C. § 1109 (b). We have previously held that party-in-interest sta-i tus is a necessary prerequisite to bankruptcy standing. In re Thorpe Insulation Co., 677 F.3d 869, 884 (9th Cir.2012). In this case, we consider whether a beneficiary of a trust who disagrees with the way the trust was administered by former trustees is a “party in interest” with standing to object to the bankruptcy court’s approval of a settlement agreement between a debtor, creditor entities held by the trust, and the former trustees. We hold that the trust beneficiary does not have party-in-interest standing under § 1109(a) to object to the settlement, at least where his interests are adequately represented by a party-in-interest trustee. We thus affirm the judgment of the district court dismissing this case for lack of standing.

I

A. The Facts

Appellant Alexander Hughes (“Hughes”) is the only son of Mark Hughes, the founder of Herbalife who passed away in 2000, and is the sole, non-contingent beneficiary of the Mark Hughes Family Trust (“Trust”). Mark Hughes’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.