Boyle

Boyle v. Bank of America CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 2015C074713California3,487 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/28/15 Boyle v. Bank of America CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Nevada) ----

TIM BOYLE et al., C074713

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 78468)

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

In 2006 plaintiffs Tim and Darlene Boyle took out a mortgage loan for $736,000. The Boyles defaulted on the loan four years later and, in an attempt to forestall foreclosure, filed suit against defendants Bank of America, N.A., and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS). Their second amended complaint alleged fraud, civil conspiracy, wrongful foreclosure in violation of Civil Code sections 2924 and 2923.5, and violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.