Tabares

Tabares v. EquiTrust Life Ins. Co. CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 2015B254409California9,624 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/28/15 Tabares v. EquiTrust Life Ins. Co. CA2/7 Appendix attached

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

DANIEL TABARES et al., B254409

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC390195) v.

EQUITRUST LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Anthony J. Mohr and Lee Smalley Edmon, Judges. Affirmed. Law Offices of Robert S. Gerstein, Robert S. Gerstein; Gianelli & Morris, and Robert S. Gianelli, for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Amy R. Bach and Daniel R. Wade for United Policyholders as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants. Reed Smith, Margaret M. Grignon, Robert D. Phillips, Jr., James C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.