Santiago

Santiago v. Anderson CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 2015G050430California3,276 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aronson, J.

Filed 9/29/15 Santiago v. Anderson CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

MARIO DE SANTIAGO,

G050430

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2012-00583445) v.

OPINION

BRUCE C. ANDERSON et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Gail Andrea Andler, Judge. Affirmed. Richard V. McMillan for Defendants and Appellants. La Jolla Law Group, Kent L. Sharp, and Brien J. O’Meara for Plaintiff and Respondent. * * *

Bruce C. Anderson, Salvador Bracamontes, and Isela Ibarra appeal from a judgment awarding Mario De Santiago $180,000 in joint and several damages against them as coconspirators in a fraudulent scheme to invest in a Nevada gold mine, plus $36,000 in loan carrying costs and $109,650 in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.