Santiago
Santiago v. Anderson CA4/3
Opinion
Opinion
Aronson, J.
Filed 9/29/15 Santiago v. Anderson CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
MARIO DE SANTIAGO,
G050430
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2012-00583445) v.
OPINION
BRUCE C. ANDERSON et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Gail Andrea Andler, Judge. Affirmed. Richard V. McMillan for Defendants and Appellants. La Jolla Law Group, Kent L. Sharp, and Brien J. O’Meara for Plaintiff and Respondent. * * *
Bruce C. Anderson, Salvador Bracamontes, and Isela Ibarra appeal from a judgment awarding Mario De Santiago $180,000 in joint and several damages against them as coconspirators in a fraudulent scheme to invest in a Nevada gold mine, plus $36,000 in loan carrying costs and $109,650 in…