In re R.G.

Contra Costa County Children & Family Services Bureau v. R.G.

Good Law
193 Cal. Rptr. 3d 189·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 854·240 Cal. App. 4th 1090
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2015A144684California3,194 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kline, J.

Appellant R.G., a nonminor dependent within the transition jurisdiction of the juvenile court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 450), appeals after the juvenile court found that he was ineligible for extended foster care support payments between January 13 and March 13, 2015, because he was neither employed at least 20 hours per week nor participating in a program or activity that promoted or removed barriers to employment, as is required to receive financial support pursuant to subdivision (b)(3) and (4) of section 11403. Section 11403 is part of the statutory scheme contained in the California Fostering Connections to Success Act (the Act; also known as Assem. Bill No. 12), under which certain youth in foster care may continue receiving financial assistance after turning 18. (Assem. Bill No. 12 (2009-2010 Reg. Sess.); Assem. Bill No. 212 (2011-2012 Reg. Sess.).) Appellant contends the court erred when it found that his documented efforts to obtain employment did not constitute compliance with the requirements of section 11403, subdivision (b)(3). We agree with appellant that the court’s findings and order were based on a misinterpretation of the governing statute and that reversal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.