Hackett

Hackett v. Mathews CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2015C073966California2,157 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/30/15 Hackett v. Mathews CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado) ----

BRENDA HACKETT, C073966

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. PC20100542)

v.

RONALD MATHEWS et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff Brenda Hackett appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court ruled against her on her action seeking to enforce a purported judgment lien against certain real property that she had previously deeded over to her former husband Patrick Hackett in accordance with their marital settlement agreement.

1 In this appeal we must decide whether a provision in a family law judgment requiring a party to maintain health insurance for the parties’ minor children gives rise to a judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.