People v. Ramirez CA1/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 1, 2015A140980California1,686 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rivera, J.

Filed 10/1/15 P. v. Ramirez CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A140980

v. JESSE RAMIREZ, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 89032231A) Defendant and Appellant.

Jesse Ramirez is the subject of a mental health conservatorship under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 5000 et seq., 5350 et seq.) (the Murphy conservatorship). Ramirez contends the evidence is insufficient to support the authorization for the conservator to require him to submit to treatment. We shall dismiss the appeal as moot. This is the second time Ramirez’s Murphy conservatorship has been before us. In Ramirez’s prior appeal (People v. Ramirez (July 31, 2014, A138461) [nonpub. opn.] (Ramirez I)), we affirmed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.