Maxon

Maxon v. Initiative Legal Group CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 2, 2015A139068California5,461 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 10/2/15 Maxon v. Initiative Legal Group CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

TERRI MAXON, as successor-in-interest, Plaintiff and Respondent,

A139068

v. INITIATIVE LEGAL GROUP APC, et al., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC-12-523966) Defendants and Appellants.

Plaintiff David Maxon sued his former attorneys for breach of fiduciary duty, violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200, and declaratory relief arising out of their representation of him in wage and hour claims against his former employer. 1 His former attorneys (defendants and now appellants in this matter) petitioned to compel arbitration of plaintiff’s claims, relying on an arbitration clause in the attorney-client agreement between them and plaintiff. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.