Maxon
Maxon v. Initiative Legal Group CA1/2
Opinion
Opinion
Miller, J.
Filed 10/2/15 Maxon v. Initiative Legal Group CA1/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
TERRI MAXON, as successor-in-interest, Plaintiff and Respondent,
A139068
v. INITIATIVE LEGAL GROUP APC, et al., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC-12-523966) Defendants and Appellants.
Plaintiff David Maxon sued his former attorneys for breach of fiduciary duty, violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200, and declaratory relief arising out of their representation of him in wage and hour claims against his former employer. 1 His former attorneys (defendants and now appellants in this matter) petitioned to compel arbitration of plaintiff’s claims, relying on an arbitration clause in the attorney-client agreement between them and plaintiff. Plaintiff…