In re T.P. CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 2, 2015B261233California380 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kriegler, J.

DISCUSSION

“‘An appeal becomes moot when, through no fault of the respondent, the occurrence of an event renders it impossible for the appellate court to grant the appellant effective relief. [Citations.]’ (In re Esperanza C. (2008) 165 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1054.)” (In re Anna S. (2010) 180 Cal.App.4th 1489, 1498.) “As a general rule, an order terminating juvenile court jurisdiction renders an appeal from a previous order in the dependency proceedings moot. [Citations.]” (In re C.C. (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 1481, 1488.) “[N]o direct relief can be granted even were we to find reversible error, [if] the juvenile court no longer has jurisdiction and we are only reviewing that court’s ruling.” (In re Michelle M. (1992) 8 Cal.App.4th 326, 330.) “However, dismissal for mootness in such circumstances is not automatic, but ‘must be decided on a case-by-case basis.’ [Citations.]” (In re C.C., supra, at p. 1488.)

4 The court continued the proceeding to consider counts pertaining to father at a later date.

5We grant Respondent’s Motion to Take Judicial Notice of Post-Judgment Evidence on Appeal, taking judicial notice of the court’s minute orders dated April 28, 2015, and May 1, 2015. (Evid.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.