Castro

Castro v. City of Sacramento CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 9, 2015C064091California7,231 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/9/15 Castro v. City of Sacramento CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

ROBERT CASTRO, JR., et al., C064091

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 34200800012385CUWMGDS) v.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO et al.,

Defendants and Respondents;

IA SACRAMENTO HOLDINGS, L.L.C., et al.,

Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

This is another chapter in the history of the litigation involving property once occupied by the Southern Pacific and Union Pacific Railroads in the City of Sacramento. As described in greater detail below, the long-vacant railyard property has been the subject of several redevelopment plans and amended redevelopment plans and multiple

1 lawsuits. The Richards Boulevard…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.