Secrest

Secrest v. Vaughn CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 9, 2015D066702California3,293 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

Filed 10/9/15 Secrest v. Vaughn CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

KIMBERLY S. SECREST, D066702

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2011-00150210-

PR-TR-NC)

ALLEN CRAIG VAUGHN, as trustee, etc.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Jay M.

Bloom, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Rancho Santa Fe and Michael W. Jacobs for Plaintiff and

Respondent.

Best Best & Krieger, Patrick E. Monroe and Rebecca Andrews for Defendant and

Appellant.

Allen Craig Vaughn (Vaughn) appeals a postjudgment order denying his motion

for contractual attorney fees, based on a 2013 settlement agreement that he negotiated in

his capacity as the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.