United States v. Craig Phillip Coleman

453 F.2d 1374 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig Phillip COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 71-2779. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 15, 1972. Gerard J. Glass (argued), Michael H. Weiss, of Hansen, Jaffe & Weiss, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant. John F. Cooney, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., F. Steele Langford, Chief, Criminal Division, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Before CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, MADDEN, * Judge of the United States Court of Claims, and TRASK, Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed. 2 At issue is the failure to exhaust an administrative remedy: that is the taking of an appeal on the classification. 3 The tests of Lockhart [Lockhart v. United States, 420 F.2d 1143 (9th Cir. 1969)] require affirmance. We cannot find this case within the exception of Donato v. United States, 302 F.2d 468 (9th Cir. 1962). * J. Warren Madden, Senior Judge of the United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation