Richard E. Coffey and Mildred M. Coffey v. United States of America, Richard E. Coffey and Mildred M. Coffey v. United States of America, United States of America v. The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Good Law
455 F.2d 1380
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 197271-1858California229 words

Opinion

Opinion

455 F.2d 1380 Richard E. COFFEY and Mildred M. Coffey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Defendants-Appellees. Richard E. COFFEY and Mildred M. Coffey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Defendants-Appellees, UNITED STATES of America et al., Defendants-Appellees, v. The ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 71-1858, 71-1859. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 27, 1972. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Russell E. Smith, Judge. William A. Dougherty (argued), of Dougherty, Law, Phillips, & Naughton, Tustin, Cal., David E. Parry (argued), John J. Balluff and John J. Schimmenti, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Leonard Schaitman, Washington, D. C. (argued), Morton Hollander, Washington, D. C., Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Before ELY, CARTER and CHOY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The facts of the case may be found in the decision of the district court in Coffey v. United States (D.C.S.D.Cal., 1971) 324 F.Supp. 1087 . It is clear that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.