United States v. William Randolph, Jr., AKA Clarence Randolph, AKA Bobby Moore

The judgment of conviction in this passing counterfeit currency case is affirmed.

We reject the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. There are many scraps of evidence, each of which alone means little, put together they could mean a lot to a jury.

On the facts here, disbelief of Randolph’s testimony could lead to some affirmative inferences of knowledge.