Robert Costandi v. Aamco Automatic Transmissions, Inc., a Corporation, and Enyart & Rose Advertising, Inc., a Corporation, Aamco Automatic Transmissions, Inc., a Corporation, Cross-Complainant and v. Robert Costandi, Cross-Defendants And

456 F.2d 941 173 U.S.P.Q. 276 , 1972 Trade Cases P 73,884 Robert COSTANDI et al., Plaintiffs, v. AAMCO AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSIONS, INC., a corporation, and Enyart & Rose Advertising, Inc., a corporation, Defendants. AAMCO AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSIONS, INC., a corporation, Cross-Complainant and Appellee, v. Robert COSTANDI et al., Cross-Defendants and Appellants. No. 24842. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 7, 1972. Albert E. Levy (argued), John H. Brill, Burton J. Goldstein, of Goldstein, Barceloux & Goldstein, San Francisco, Cal., for appellants. Peter W. Fisher, (argued), of Maloney, Chase, Fisher & Hurst, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR * , District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 The plaintiffs (franchisees) brought this action against the defendant, AAMCO Automatic Transmissions, Inc., franchisor (AAMCO), seeking damages for alleged violations of the anti-trust laws of the United States; for restitution based upon fraud which induced the franchisees to enter into franchising agreements with AAMCO; and recovery for unjust enrichment. 2 AAMCO cross-complained alleging breach of the franchise agreements;…