Diana Heilman v. Michael Memeo

MEMORANDUM

Diana Heilman appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment on her claims of sex and age discrimination and breach of contract. In the district court, Heilman challenged the termination of her employment, alleging that her employer discriminated against her on the basis of sex and age, breached her employment contract by failing to comply with the pre-termination procedures set forth in Nevada Revised Statutes § 62.110, and violated other provisions of federal and state law. After dismissing some claims, the district court granted summary judgment to defendants on all remaining claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We reverse as to Heilman’s breach of contract claim and remand for further proceedings on that claim, and affirm as to all other claims.

We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment. Dreiling v. Am. Online Inc., 578 F.3d 995, 1000 (9th Cir.2009). We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party to determine whether any genuine issues of material fact exist and whether the district court correctly applied the relevant substantive law. Id.

Heilman resigned from her employment. To…