United States v. Wallace Bear

Good Law
357 F. App'x 94
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 200909-30022California367 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Wallace John Bear (“Bear”) appeals a life sentence imposed following his guilty plea to second degree murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1111 and 1153(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 , and we affirm.

Bear argues that in requesting the district court to impose a life sentence, the government breached the parties’ written plea agreement.

We disagree. In the plea agreement, Bear and the government agreed that “[t]he United States and the Defendant reserve all right, without condition, to make any appropriate sentencing recommendation.” Because the terms of the plea agreement were unambiguous and imposed no limitation on the government’s sentence recommendation, the government did not breach the plea agreement when it argued for a life sentence.

We also reject Bear’s argument that the government’s sentencing recommendation rendered its promise to request a Sentencing Guidelines point reduction illusory. Before imposing sentence, the district court, as required, calculated the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range, which included downward adjustments for Bear’s acceptance of responsibility and early plea as requested by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.