Martinez-Reyes

Martinez-Reyes v. Holder

Good Law
358 F. App'x 822
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 200996-70204California231 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petitioner Juan Gerardo Martinez-Reyes (Martinez-Reyes) appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his application for suspension of deportation based on extreme hardship. See 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a)(1).

The BIA considered the relevant evidence supporting Martinez-Reyes’s claim before finding that his hardships were not extreme. In doing so, the BIA articulated reasons supported by the record for its decision. Because it “considered all of the relevant facts and articulated reasons for denying suspension that are supported by the record”, the BIA did not abuse its discretion. See Astrero v. I.N.S., 104 F.3d 264, 267 (9th Cir.1996).

Although we deny the petition for review, due to the unusual procedural posture of this case, we stay issuance of the mandate for 180 days to provide Martinez-Reyes an opportunity to file a motion to reopen with the BIA. See Ortiz v. I.N.S., 179 F.3d 1148, 1152 (9th Cir.1999) (staying mandate to allow petitioners an opportunity to file a motion to reopen). Although we do not address the merits of Martinez-Reyes’s claim, we note that his recent deportation does not preclude him from filing a motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.