Triggs
Triggs v. Chrones
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 30, 200908-15151California185 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 30 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
KETHON LAVERON TRIGGS, No. 08-15151
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-00-04201-CW Northern District of California, v. Oakland
LEE ANN CHRONES, Acting Warden,
ORDER
Respondent - Appellee,
and
A. A. LAMARQUE,
Respondent.
Before: THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, * District Judge.
The memorandum disposition filed on September 15, 2009 is AMENDED as
follows:
On Page 7, delete the sentence reading: “Because the California Court of
Appeal addressed the merits of this claim, we review under the deferential AEDPA
standard.” Replace the deleted sentence with the following sentence: “In
reviewing these claims, we need not decide whether Triggs properly presented
* The Honorable David Ezra, United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. them to the California Court of Appeal because, whether we apply AEDPA’s
deferential standard of review or review de novo, we reach the same…