Beck

United States v. Beck

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 4, 200503-30470California3,645 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-30470 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-02-00432-AJB

MICHAEL EMMETT BECK,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 13, 2004—Portland, Oregon

Filed January 5, 2005

Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Ronald M. Gould, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Gould

91 UNITED STATES v. BECK

COUNSEL

Christopher J. Schatz, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Portland, Oregon, for the defendant-appellant.

Karin J. Immergut, United States Attorney, District of Ore- gon, and Frank Noonan, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Michael Beck appeals several rulings of the district court made during his trial for bank robbery pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). The district court denied Beck’s pre-trial motions to exclude evidence of photograph identification and in-court eyewitness identification of Beck,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.