Oscar Rivas-Cruz v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
351 F. App'x 204
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 30, 200908-72132California268 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Walter Alexander Cabrera-Rodríguez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir.2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir.2004). We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006). We deny the petition for review.

We reject Cabrera-Rodriguez’s claim that he is eligible for asylum and withholding of removal based on his membership in a particular social group, namely, young El Salvadorean males retaliated against for refusing to join gangs. See Barrios v. Holder, 581 F.3d 849, 854-56 (9th Cir. 2009) (rejecting as a particular social group “young males in Guatemala who are targeted for gang recruitment but refuse because they disagree with the gang’s criminal activities”); Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.