Rivera

Rivera v. Ashcroft

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 200503-35548California8,492 words

Opinion

Opinion

FERGUSON, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SALVADOR RIVERA,  No. 03-35548 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General;  CV-03-00634-TSZ

ORDER AND

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION

AMENDED

SERVICE,

OPINION

Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 7, 2004* Seattle, Washington

Filed October 18, 2004 Amended January 7, 2005

Before: Harry Pregerson, Warren J. Ferguson, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Ferguson; Dissent by Judge Callahan

*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

181 184 RIVERA v. ASHCROFT

COUNSEL

Cheryl M. Nance, Bell, Flegenheimer & Nance, Seattle, Washington; Karen L. Gilbert, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Kirsten M. Schimpff, United States Attorney’s Office, Seattle, Washington, for the defendants-appellees.

ORDER

The opinion filed October 18, 2004, 387 F.3d 835 (9th Cir. 2004), is hereby amended. The amended opinion is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.