Mayo

United States v. Mayo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 200504-10076California2,887 words

Opinion

Opinion

Facts

On July 16, 2002, Officer Fritts of the Stockton Police Department Narcotics Unit received a call from the manager of a Super-8 Motel.1 The manager reported suspicious activity in the motel’s parking lot. Four cars—a brown Chevrolet truck, red Pontiac Firebird, silver Dodge Caravan, and a silver Honda Civic (Mayo’s car)—pulled up next to each other. The occupants got out of their cars and began talking. One of the occupants handed another a package of some sort. The driver of the truck wiped down the steering wheel and door handle of the truck with a rag or shirt, and then he walked away from the group, carrying a maroon backpack. The manager gave Officer Fritts the make and license plate number of each of the four vehicles. 1 Officer Fritts knew the manager because the motel was located in an area with high narcotics activity. Officer Fritts had given the manager his phone number so that she could report any suspicious activity to him. From the record, it appears that she had called Officer Fritts at least twice before to report suspicious activity at her motel. [Id.] UNITED STATES v. MAYO 735 After Officer Fritts received the call, he radioed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.