Arnold A. Smith and Rachael Smith, His Wife, and Herbert Smith and Evelyn Smith, His Wife v. United States

Good Law
458 F.2d 1231·29 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1070·1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10033
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 197226027California1,075 words

Opinion

Opinion

Herbert and Arnold Smith, together with their respective wives, commenced this suit in the District Court against the United States to recover damages for the use of their warehouse. Jurisdiction was invoked under the Tucker Act. The matter is here on the appeal of the United States from a judgment for the Smiths.

The facts are undisputed. On May 8, 1964, United States Internal Revenue Service executed a distraint warrant for unpaid taxes owing by Lichty Printing and Business Forms, Inc. Levy was made upon Lichty printing presses and other equipment in Smiths’ building, which Lichty had been renting on a monthly basis. The seizure was accomplished by simply padlocking the building and posting the customary notices.

The Smiths thereupon notified the government agents that Lichty had failed to pay rent for several months and demanded that the government either vacate the premises or pay for their use. They informed the government's agents that the rental would be at the rate of $45.00 per day, that being the sum exacted of Lichty. The agents declared this sum excessive, but did not relinquish possession.

On June 5, 1964, Lichty was adjudicated a bankrupt on a voluntary petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.