Dees
Dees v. Billy
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 18, 200503-16004California2,400 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DOUGLAS DEES,
Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 03-16004 v. D.C. No.
CV-02-00303-HDM
HELMUTH T. BILLY, M.D.; GREGORY
E. GINN, M.D., OPINION
Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 9, 2004—San Francisco, California
Filed January 19, 2005
Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Robert E. Cowen,* and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge O’Scannlain
*The Honorable Robert E. Cowen, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation. COUNSEL
W. Ruel Walker, Oakland, California, argued the cause for the appellant; Carl M. Hebert, Reno, Nevada, was on the briefs.
Denise H. Greer, Schmid & Voiles, Los Angeles, California, argued the cause for the appellees; Patricia Egan Daehnke, 822 DEES v. BILLY Bonne, Bridges, Mueller, O’Keefe & Nichols, Las Vegas, Nevada, was on the brief.