Nevada Bell v. Advanced Telcom

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 200501-15790California165 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NEVADA BELL, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PAC-WEST TELECOMM, INC., No. 01-15790 Defendant-Appellant, and  D.C. No.

CV-99-00492-ECR

NEVADA PUBLIC UTILITIES ORDER

COMMISSION; JUDY M. SHELDREW,

and MICHAEL A. PITLOCK, Commissioners, Defendants.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Edward C. Reed, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 12, 2005—San Francisco, California

Filed January 24, 2005

Before: John T. Noonan, Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Robert E. Jones.*

COUNSEL

D. Anthony Rodriguez, San Francisco, California, for the defendant-appellant.

*The Honorable Robert E. Jones, United States Senior District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

1013 1014 BELL v. PAC-WEST TELECOMM Kevin M. Fong, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff- appellee.

ORDER

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.