Rivera

Rivera v. Philip Morris, Inc.

Good Law
395 F.3d 1142·2005 WL 181875
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 200503-16100California5,525 words

Opinion

Opinion

Farris, J.

Joe Rivera brought a wrongful death action against Philip Morris Inc., a tobacco manufacturer, asserting state law claims for strict product liability, fraud, and conspiracy. Summary judgment in favor of Philip Morris was granted. We affirm in part and remand for further proceedings.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Facts

Joe Rivera initiated this action individually, as Guardian ad Litem for his children and as executor of his deceased wife’s estate. He filed suit in Nevada state court, alleging strict product liability based on theories of failure-to-warn and design-defect, fraud based on theories of both fraudulent concealment and fraudulent misrepresentation, and conspiracy. He contended that his late wife, Pamela Rivera, smoked Marlboro cigarettes manufactured by Philip Morris beginning in the summer of 1969 until her death from lung cancer in 1999.

B. District Court Proceedings

This action was timely and properly removed from state to federal court under diversity jurisdiction. The district court subsequently granted summary judgment in favor of Philip Morris, on grounds that (1) the strict product liability claim was preempted by the Federal Cigarette La beling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.