Woodford

Williams v. Woodford

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 1, 200599-99018California7,790 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STANLEY WILLIAMS, 

Petitioner-Appellant, Nos. 99-99018 v. 00-99001 JEANNE WOODFORD, Warden,  D.C. No. California State Prison at San CV-89-00327-SVW Quentin, ORDER Respondent-Appellee.  Filed February 2, 2005

Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Thomas G. Nelson, and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.

Order; Dissent by Judge Rawlinson

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehear- ing. Judge Gould has voted to reject the suggestion for rehear- ing en banc and Judges Hug and T.G. Nelson have so recommended.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the mat- ter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc con- sideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehear- ing en banc are DENIED.

1315 1316 WILLIAMS v. WOODFORD RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge, with whom PREGERSON,

REINHARDT,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.