Ortega-Aguilar

Ortega-Aguilar v. Holder

Good Law
358 F. App'x 905
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 200906-74062California212 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tomas Reyes-Torres, his wife, Melania Ortega-Mondragan, and their children, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Ordonez v. INS, 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Reyes’ motion to reopen because the BIA considered the evidence submitted and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”).

In his opening brief, Reyes does not challenge the BIA’s determination that he untimely filed his motion to reconsider the merits of the underlying case. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues which are not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.