Estrada

Estrada v. Holder

Good Law
355 F. App'x 993
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 200904-76531, 05-72613California231 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Lizardi Magali Estrada, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal and, upon reconsideration, again dismissing her appeal. As the BIA granted Estrada’s motion to reconsider, we dismiss the petition for review in No. 04-76531. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(1) (jurisdiction over final orders of removal). We have jurisdiction in petition No. 05-72613 under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. Ashcroft, 390 F.3d 649, 651 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA properly concluded that Estrada is statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal based on her conviction for a crime of domestic violence. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229b(b)(l)(C); 1227(a)(2)(E)®; see also Gonzalez-Gonzalez, 390 F.3d at 651-53 . Estrada’s contention that she is eligible for cancellation because her conviction is not a crime involving moral turpitude is inapposite. Moreover, her contention that the petty offense exception applies in her case is unavailing. See Cisneros-Perez v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.