Ameline

United States v. Ameline

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 8, 200502-30326California5,242 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richard A. Paez, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 02-30326 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-02-00011-SEH

ALFRED ARNOLD AMELINE, ORDER AND

Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 4, 2003* Opinion Filed July 21, 2004 Rehearing Granted February 9, 2005 Opinion on Rehearing Filed February 9, 2005 Seattle, Washington

Filed February 9, 2005

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Ronald M. Gould, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Richard A. Paez

*The Panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Brian P. Fay, Angel, Coil & Bartlett, Bozeman, Montana, for the appellant.

William W. Mercer, United States Attorney, and Lori Harper Suek, Assistant United States Attorney, Great Falls, Montana; Michael A. Rotker, Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the appellee.

ORDER

Appellant Alfred Ameline’s Petition for Rehearing is granted. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.