Ameline
United States v. Ameline
Opinion
Opinion
Richard A. Paez, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 02-30326 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-02-00011-SEH
ALFRED ARNOLD AMELINE, ORDER AND
Defendant-Appellant. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 4, 2003* Opinion Filed July 21, 2004 Rehearing Granted February 9, 2005 Opinion on Rehearing Filed February 9, 2005 Seattle, Washington
Filed February 9, 2005
Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Ronald M. Gould, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Richard A. Paez
*The Panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Brian P. Fay, Angel, Coil & Bartlett, Bozeman, Montana, for the appellant.
William W. Mercer, United States Attorney, and Lori Harper Suek, Assistant United States Attorney, Great Falls, Montana; Michael A. Rotker, Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the appellee.