Ruiz-Alonso

United States v. Ruiz-Alonso

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 200503-50125California2,435 words

Opinion

Opinion

Graber COUNSEL, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 03-50125 v. ALBERTO RUIZ-ALONSO, aka Alberto  D.C. No.

CR-02-00591-TJH

Torrez-Ugaldo, aka Alberto

OPINION

Torrez-Ugalde, Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Terry J. Hatter, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued May 12, 2004; Resubmitted January 31, 2005 Pasadena, California

Filed February 11, 2005

Before: James R. Browning, Pamela Ann Rymer, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Graber COUNSEL

Nancy B. Spiegel, Assistant United States Attorney, Criminal Appeals Section, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiff- appellant.

Jonathan D. Libby, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-appellee.

OPINION

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

In this illegal reentry case, the United States appeals the district court’s decision at sentencing to depart downward by four levels. Defendant Alberto Ruiz-Alonso seeks to dismiss the appeal because of the government’s alleged failure to demonstrate that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.