Jones
Jones v. Etrade Mortgage
Opinion
Opinion
Noonan COUNSEL, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LARRY L. JONES; JANET JONES,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 03-55575 v. D.C. No.
CV-02-01123-MJL
E*TRADE MORTGAGE CORPORATION;
E*TRADE BANK, OPINION
Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 10, 2004—Pasadena, California
Filed February 11, 2005
Before: Betty B. Fletcher, John T. Noonan, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Noonan COUNSEL
Daniel H. Harris, Chicago, Illinois, for the plaintiffs- appellants.
Douglas P. Lobel, McLean, Virginia, for the defendants- appellees.
OPINION
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
Larry L. Jones (Jones) and Janet Jones appeal the judgment of the district court dismissing their complaint with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action under the Truth In Lend- ing Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601— 1667f, against E*Trade Mortgage Company and E*Trade Bank (collectively E*Trade). Holding that the Joneses have stated a viable com- plaint, we…