Unuakhaulu

Unuakhaulu v. Ashcroft

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 200502-73837California3,555 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EHI JOSEPH UNUAKHAULU,  No. 02-73837 Petitioner, Agency No. v.  A74-777-018 JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, AMENDED Respondent.  OPINION

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 3, 2004* Pasadena, California

Opinion Filed December 20, 2004 Amended February 14, 2005

Before: A. Wallace Tashima, Raymond C. Fisher and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.

The opinion filed at 392 F.3d 1024 (2004) is amended in full as follows:

Opinion by Judge Fisher

*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1805 1808 UNUAKHAULU v. ASHCROFT

COUNSEL

Mark A. Karlin, Karlin & Karlin, Los Angeles, California, for the petitioner.

Francis W. Fraser, Senior Litigation Counsel, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

OPINION

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

Ehi Joseph Unuakhaulu, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.