United States v. Moises Valverde-Garcia

Good Law
358 F. App'x 946
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 200909-50143California254 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moisés Valverde-Garcia appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.

Valverde-Garcia contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider all the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) factors and that his sentence was substantively unreasonable given that his prior felony convictions were for non-violent immigration offenses. Our review of the record indicates that the judge’s § 3553(a) analysis was procedurally adequate under the circumstances. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 359 , 127 S.Ct. 2456 , 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 995 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc). Considering the totality of the circumstances, as well as the § 3553(a) factors, the district court’s sentence was substantively reasonable. Id. at 993.

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir.2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.