Cooper-Smith

Cooper-Smith v. Palmateer

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 15, 200503-35794California4,555 words

Opinion

Opinion

T.G. Nelson, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL T. COOPER-SMITH,  No. 03-35794 Petitioner-Appellant, v.  D.C. No.

CV-00-00848-GMK

JOAN PALMATEER,

OPINION

Respondent-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Garr M. King, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 8, 2004—Portland, Oregon

Filed February 16, 2005

Before: Thomas G. Nelson, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges, and William W Schwarzer,* District Judge.

Opinion by Judge T.G. Nelson

*The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

1933 1936 COOPER-SMITH v. PALMATEER

COUNSEL

Stephen R. Sady, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Portland, Oregon, for the petitioner-appellant. COOPER-SMITH v. PALMATEER 1937 Carolyn Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, Ore- gon, for the respondent-appellee.

OPINION

T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:

Michael Cooper-Smith appeals the district court’s denial of his writ of habeas corpus for alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.