Moreno-Hernandez

United States v. Moreno-Hernandez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 200503-30387California4,359 words

Opinion

Opinion

Berzon COUNSEL, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-30387 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-03-30012-AA

ISIDRO MORENO-HERNANDEZ,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 15, 2004—Portland, Oregon

Submission Withdrawn September 28, 2004 Resubmitted February 18, 2005

Filed February 18, 2005

Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Ronald M. Gould, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Berzon COUNSEL

Robert M. Stone, Medford, Oregon, for the defendant- appellant.

Karin J. Immergut, United States Attorney, District of Ore- gon, and Robert G. Thomson (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, Medford, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Once more, we are asked to determine whether a federal defendant’s previous state-law conviction is for a “felony that 1976 UNITED STATES v. MORENO-HERNANDEZ is . . . a crime of violence” under section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the U.S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.