Jeronimo
United States v. Jeronimo
Opinion
Opinion
GOULD, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 03-30394 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-02-60067-1-
PASCUAL DIONICIO JERONIMO, MRH
Defendant-Appellant. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael R. Hogan, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 13, 2004—Portland, Oregon
Filed February 23, 2005
Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Ronald M. Gould, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Gould; Dissent by Judge Berzon
2087 2090 UNITED STATES v. JERONIMO
COUNSEL
Richard L. Fredericks, Eugene, Oregon, for the defendant- appellant.
Karin J. Immergut, United States Attorney, District of Ore- gon, and Frank R. Papagni, Jr., Assistant United States Attor- ney, District of Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellee.
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
We consider whether a plea agreement is enforceable and effectively waives the right of appeal. We conclude that we are without jurisdiction to assess the merits of this direct appeal.