Castillo

Castillo v. McFadden

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 200503-15715California9,615 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMANDO CASTILLO,  No. 03-15715 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-02-00466-PGR

JAMES MCFADDEN; ARIZONA ORDER

ATTORNEY GENERAL, AMENDING

Respondents-Appellees. OPINION AND

DISSENT AND

 DENYING

PETITION FOR

PANEL

REHEARING AND

PETITION FOR

REHEARING EN

BANC AND

AMENDED

 OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 12, 2004—San Francisco, California

Opinion Filed June 1, 2004 Amended February 24, 2005

Before: Pamela Ann Rymer, Michael Daly Hawkins, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Bybee; Dissent by Judge Hawkins Anders V. Rosenquist, Jr., and Florence M. Bruemmer, Rosenquist & Associates, Phoenix, Arizona, for the petitioner-appellant.

John L. Saccoman, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Ari- zona, for the respondents-appellees.

ORDER

The opinion and dissent filed on June 1, 2004 and pub- lished at 370 F.3d 882 (9th Cir. 2004), are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.