Turecek
Turecek v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CITIZENS FOR HONESTY AND
INTEGRITY IN REGIONAL PLANNING,
Plaintiff, No. 03-55830 and KARL J. TURECEK, D.C. No.
CV-02-01855-RMB
Plaintiff-Appellant,
ORDER
v.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Rudi M. Brewster, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 10, 2005—Pasadena, California
Filed February 25, 2005
Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Frank J. Magill,* and Pamela Ann Rymer, Circuit Judges.
COUNSEL
Scott Zarin, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff- appellant.
*The Honorable Frank J. Magill, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.
2205 2206 TURECEK v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO C. Ellen Pilsecker, Senior Deputy, County of San Diego, San Diego, California, for defendant-appellee.
ORDER
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The dis- trict court record reveals that there was no case or controversy between Karl A. Turecek (“Turecek”) and the County of San Diego (“the County”)…