Juan Sierra Mejia v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
357 F. App'x 922
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 200908-72619California219 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Resham Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Gonz alez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995 , 998 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that even if Singh were credible, the government established by a preponderance of the evidence that Singh could reasonably relocate within India. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13 (b)(3)(ii); Sowe v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1281, 1286-87 (9th Cir.2008) (the presumption of a well-founded fear of persecution can be rebutted by showing that the applicant could avoid future persecution by relocation). Accordingly, Singh’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Gonzalez-Hernandez, 336 F.3d at 1001 n. 5.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Singh failed to demonstrate that it was more likely than not he would be tortured if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.