Garceau

Garceau v. Woodford

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 200599-99022California246 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT FREDERICK GARCEAU,  No. 99-99022 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v.  CV F-95-5363 JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Warden, of OWW San Quentin State Prison,

ORDER

Respondent-Appellee.  On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Argued and Submitted March 24, 2004—San Francisco, California

Filed March 3, 2005

Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, A. Wallace Tashima, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.

COUNSEL

Lynne S. Coffin, Coffin & Love, San Francisco, California, for the petitioner-appellant.

Clayton S. Tanaka, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for the respondent-appellee.

ORDER

The Supreme Court reversed our prior judgment and remanded this case for us to determine the effect of the

2459 2460 GARCEAU v. WOODFORD Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 on this case. See Woodford v. Garceau, 538 U.S. 202, 210 (2003). After supplemental briefing after remand, oral argument, and submission of the case for decision, petitioner Robert Freder- ick Garceau died on December 29, 2004.

Because petitioner’s death renders this case moot,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.